233 replies to this topic

[Wolfman]

I just think that one gothic window with shutters, in the corner of the beige structure, near the upper left, is out of place. I mean, the rest of the structure looks sort of modern, (in contrast with the other period structures in the area,) I think the window that's just below it would work out better as a replacement. The trim along the roof is colored differently.

I also noticed that the wall to the right of the doorway of the same structure, does not extend to the ground fully, like the wall to the left. Why do people insist upon putting hedges between sidewalks and gardens? (I see that in parks all the time lately.) Doesn't that just block the peeps view of seeing the gardens?

Theres something blocking the black footpath from connecting itself. inside that left walkway under the center structure. It might be a partial wall that is higher than what can be visibly seen OR something WAS there, and the path was never repared. In any case, it's not continuous footpath. Is it me, or does the bumped out windows seem to need some sort of "support" beneath them, like a couple deco blocks sticking out as a support?

I like the thicker walls in the tunnel support construction. It looks a lot better than the fatter 1/4 tile blocks and thicker than just using wall objects. The roof of the same structure looks better than if the roof was just a flat plane of shingles. Theres a texture with the different colored shingles and the two different angles with the barn-like roof construction. I really don't mind the flat roofs. And the mechinery on the roof is a cool detail. Yet non-discript. The fountain looks good.

[Terrapin]

DUMP

[Luketh]

Don't like the glass, but the windows look better than the original structure's windows.

[Terrapin]

[RNRMontuX]

Looks good really like the building in your other post.

[Terrapin]

Random building from a new project.

Edited by Terrapin, 23 March 2013 - 11:56 PM.

[K0NG]

Ya know......I always wondered why your 'new' stuff always seems to look exactly like your old stuff. Even when you say you've turned the proverbial corner, building wise. I might have figured something out, but it would be impossible to explain from post to post in a forum.

Feel free to hit me up on AIM and we'll see if we can't change that.

It's RCTK0NG, by the way....I just realized there's no spot in the profile for that info.

Edited by K0NG, 26 March 2013 - 06:31 AM.

[Sambo]

Feel free to hit me up on AIM and we'll see if we can't change that.

It's RCTK0NG, by the way....I just realized there's no spot in the profile for that info.

When you go to your Profile you should see a button on the top of your profile screen labeled Edit my Profile. In this information under Other Information, there is a place for your AIM contact.

[Terrapin]

I guess I should have mentioned that the project isn't your typical amusement park.

[K0NG]

I guess I should have mentioned that the project isn't your typical amusement park.

The actual setting for your building is irrelevant. The issue I see in all of your work is a flaw in the logic, composition and dynamics of your structures...which results in the 'sameness' that all of your screens have.

When you go to your Profile you should see a button on the top of your profile screen labeled Edit my Profile. In this information under Other Information, there is a place for your AIM contact.

Actually Sam, there isn't. There's a slot for MSN, Website URL, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Skype.....pretty much everything but AIM just sayin'...........