163 replies to this topic

[OrlanDude]

Wolfman - last year's top 4 parks are still available here; there are screenshots of all 24 entries from 2005. Hope that helps.

I know I'm downloading the top 4 right now!

Edited by OrlanDude, 04 December 2006 - 10:32 PM.

[Buckeye Becky]

BTW: Buckeye Becky, you said last years contest was a great success. I was wondering if the files were still available? I'm sure that there are many, as I, are hooked on seeing these great little parks. Any chance we can take a gander at last year's entries?

Wolfman - last year's top 4 parks are still available here; there are screenshots of all 24 entries from 2005. Hope that helps.

I know I'm downloading the top 4 right now!

Yes, sorry, I had hosted them myself for a whole year, but took them down right before we started this one. You can still see them in the collage and also download the top 4 winners.

OH....yes, Park #4 is up for download in the first post....enjoy!

I am still hoping to get a couple more entries (from people who haven't entered a park yet)...for those who are so inclined to join in the fun

[Gwazi]

Although the coaster seemed a tad painful, it was pretty cool. The name was good, and the supports were creative. Although one would think that the inconsistency with the supports would be bad, but I liked it because in real life the chances of it being consistent would not be high. I didn't like the lack of any buildings, walls, structures, etc., as it was just a couple of extra scenery pieces, but the rest was nice. Also, a pet-peeve of mine was in this park - the vertical 3D sign with no back supports. But that doesn't take away from this park. Great work, contestant #4!

[OrlanDude]

THREE - Very beautiful little Christmas village and (like everyone else) I loved the flying reindeer, but the lack of any rides (I consider the reindeer as decoration) slightly hurt this entry.


FOUR - An ambitious attempt to put a large coaster into such a small space is ruined by such horrible ratings. Perhaps if the builder would have reduced the height in half and used banked curves the coaster may have been ride-able. Also I agree with Gwazi that the lack of any buildings or other rides & scenery really hurts this entry.

Edited by OrlanDude, 05 December 2006 - 03:24 AM.

[Levis]

Four was a nice try but it ended out bad ....

the lack of theming was a bit of a dissapointment for me .

[Emergo]

Four: kudos for the attempt to get such a large coaster with > one minute ride-time in such a small map, but indeed, like said above: it must be a torture to ride that one!.

Silly thing is that even with hardly any scenery, the whole thing did give me a good winter and Christmas feeling....so that I liked (as long as I don't have to ride that coaster!


Emergo

[**cjman**]

alright alright...i sent mine in.....

anyway, i'll try to look at entries 3 & 4 when i can.

OW!! I BIT MY CHEEK AGIN!!!

[Gwazi]

^ Who's Agin?

[mattec222]

That coaster made me feel and all at tha same time!!!