70 replies to this topic

[xophe]

Xophe, what kind of computer do you have? My computer is running at about 5 fps without the patch but I'm not sure how that compares to other computers. I haven't tried loading this on my other computer because I know it will be bad.

I have a Sony VAIO with Intel Pentium 4 processor 3.4E GHz, 128MB ATI Radeon 9600XT graphics card, 200GB HDD.

Edited by xophe, 30 December 2004 - 06:07 PM.

[chrsharvick29]

I have a Sony VAIO with Intel Pentium 4 processor 3.4E GHz, 128MB ATI Radeon 9600XT graphics card, 200GB HDD.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thanks, I'm running Dell Inspiron 9200 with Intel Pentium M Processor 1.6 GHz, 128MB Mobility ATI Radeon 9700, 80GB HDD, and 1GB of RAM.

Your system looks like it should run good. How much RAM do you have?

Anybody else running Pentium M Processor because mine seems to run the game quite well and my settings are on high. The lowest fps rate I got was about 1 fps when I was viewing the park from the side angle.

[mantis]

Although it probably doesn't make up for my lack of RCT3, that video was more than amazing. Good job to whoever made that, and excellent work Six Frags. Would you mind if I linked to this over at NE? Cos I think people should see it.

[Boomer]

The Brochure? Or just the park Mantis? Good to see you again, I hope you have destroyed my one and only posted RCT park that I sent you for a review, a long... long... time ago. If anyone was to see that I would be laughed out of the community. Especially with work like this park and all the others made by you "Pros". BTW: Thanks for the help in writing walkthroughs while I had to be away. I was very glad to see you doing these as I still beleive you're one of the best writers in the community. Sorry to jump OT here but it's been awhile since I've heard from this (young) old veteren of the RCT community.

---Boomer---

[Six Frags]

Although it probably doesn't make up for my lack of RCT3, that video was more than amazing. Good job to whoever made that, and excellent work Six Frags.  Would you mind if I linked to this over at NE? Cos I think people should see it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Thanks mantis, I'm glad you like it. And I also made that video (I actually made 3 versions, but it was too large in the 2 previous versions)..
Oh, and off course you can link it to NE, would be awesome if especially YOU linked it

The Brochure?  Or just the park Mantis?   Good to see you again, I hope you have destroyed my one and only posted RCT park that I sent you for a review, a long... long... time ago.  If anyone was to see that I would be laughed out of the community.  Especially with work like this park and all the others made by you "Pros".  BTW: Thanks for the help in writing walkthroughs while I had to be away.  I was very glad to see you doing these as I still beleive you're one of the best writers in the community.  Sorry to jump OT here but it's been awhile since I've heard from this (young) old veteren of the RCT community. 

---Boomer---

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

C'mon Boomer, don't be too hard on yourself.. I don't think ANY park is bad, as long as the creator didn't build it, because he needs to achieve something or prove hisself.. then parks become bad imo..

SF

[twister2489]

SF, the park looks incredible. First RCT3 park I've seen that's worth downloading IMO.

Unfortunately I was not able to take an in depth look into the park, since I only had an FPS of 0.2, even with the settings on extremely low.

Its a shame really.... Anyways awesome job and cograts on your first VP3D!

[postit]

I'm a bit afraid of downloading...Finally got RCT3 on the computer running, I'm afraid I'm going to overload the computer if I download this; especially when I'm getting
"Windows has Memory Virtually Low"
every 5 minutes.

So, how large is the file...Might help me determine if the machine can take it.

[uncle_adolph]

Woooooooooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not only is the park out, but VP3D is here!!!!!!!!!!!

WOowowowowowow!!!!

---- Crikey ----

That brochure is soooo coool!!!

Nice one, just dling...

Eh Edit: Errr.. It's kindof unplayable isn't it... I'm sure the park is brilliant but it's too slow to take a look at...

-Ben

Edited by uncle_adolph, 02 January 2005 - 10:28 AM.

[ja227]

Initializing Park...

Wow, I'm not keeping time, but I think it's been like 10 minutes since I clicked on the park to load into sandbox mode. This is my first downloaded RCT3 park, so I didn't know what to expect. It's hard to tell if it's stalled or just slow.

Anyway, if I ever get it loaded up. I'll comment.

I hope this isn't typical of all parks with more than two rides and a little scenery

I was thinking it ran fine on my CPU until now...

[Sambo]

...it does take a while, don't it?

Such is the lesson for RCT3 parks submitted for future Vacation Parks. There is such a thing as too big. Ensueño is a bit slow framerate wise and still enjoyable - but could you imagine a 250 x250 park chock filled with rides and thousands of peeps? The VP would be over before the judges could get through the main gate!