51 replies to this topic

[ioafreak]

can you release a non-roof version of the park?

[X250]

Thats the fun in this park though! I love peeling away the roofs to find whats inside, its like christmas to me... :">

[psychomusician]

its a cool design, but it doesnt seem to work as a scenario, i tried playing it, and i had noone come to the park, and every single ride broke down as soon as it was opened.
but you obviously put a ton of effort into this

[Ultratycoon]

It wasn't meant to be a scenario type park. It's only for the looks mostly. By the way, people around here can get annoyed when other people bump old topics and this topic is pretty old. Just to give you a heads up before other people start yelling at you.

[lazyboy97O]

Well I for one am not annoyed at the bumpiness. But I really don't get this idea that DNY was somehow peep friendly or a scenario. I seem to get the off beat email or PM about this.

The park does need the Ride Fixer "Patch" to operate.

[Emergo]

It wasn't meant to be a scenario type park. It's only for the looks mostly. By the way, people around here can get annoyed when other people bump old topics and this topic is pretty old. Just to give you a heads up before other people start yelling at you.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ultra, you are quite right about explaining that this park is for the looks mostly.
But what is "bumping"?
Bumping, I think, is making a non-relevant reply to a very old topic, just to get interest in the topic again.
In this case (and many others) there is, imo, no bumping at all. Just a very new member, that did not have the occasion to answer/ask earlier in this topic, and is doing so now, as the topic still exists. Nothing wrong with that I think......

When answers to this topic are no longer wanted, the starter of the topic could ask to close it, or a mod, if he/she feels it is justified, could close it. If that is not done, and members still react with a no-nonsense reply, I cannot see why it would be considered "bumping"

[wabigbear]

We generally frown here on anyone posting in a topic that has had no other posts for over a couple of months, usually because the original reason for the thread may have changed, the originator of the thread is no longer available, other threads may cover the subject better and be more recent, etc. It can also be annoying to see a thread about a topic that you stop and read, only to find that the subject is months old.

While we aren't going to tar and feather someone before riding them out of town on a rail for resurrecting an old thread, we do ask that people note the last time someone posted to something before adding their own.

However, in the case of Vacation Parks, because of their special nature I think they should welcome comments for as long as they are available. A VP is timeless. The creators of these parks also usually are long-standing members who visit often to answer comments. So in this case it's okay to post comments or ask questions, as you'll most likely get an answer in return!

[postit]

Open the park using 8 cars per trainer. I never did try that and I remember asking the same question all that time ago.

[lazyboy97O]

Open the park using 8 cars per trainer.  I never did try that and I remember asking the same question all that time ago.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Will not help. You need the Ride Fix "Patch".

[Six Frags]

I don't think bumping old VP park topics is bad, but I think it is when there's just a new VP park posted; It detracts from the new VP park, and therefor gets a bit annoying (at least to me)..

SF