399 replies to this topic

[Wolfman]

<- letting his ugly nerdiness shine.

No problem. I could of just edited the post and not said a word.
But I think that would of been disrespectful of the individual.

[Luketh]

Meh, you and you're awsome power.....
Please change it......
Okay no more posting about my ugly nerdiness, we need to get back on topic...

Edited by Luketh, 10 January 2008 - 10:44 PM.

[Eh!Steve!]

Oh... My... Gosh...

I'm already looking forward to what will happen next in the ride.
Also on the edge of my seat.
Keep 'em comin'. \m/

[Wolfman]

<- letting his ugly nerdiness shine.

No problem. I could of just edited the post and not said a word.
But I think that would of been disrespectful of the individual.

Oh. Sorry! I thought you might of noticed that the arrow was pointing at my avatar.
(Thusly the statement that it was MY ugly nerdines shining.)

[Luketh]

Oh.... LOL I thought it was pointing to the last post of the last page. Then it would've been refering to MY ugly nerdiness and not YOURS, oh well, we're both ugly nerds...

[Wolfman]

Who are you calling "ugly"?

[adamcolvin]

LOL, ok... Well, back to my topic
I've got a big question to ask you. This is relating to my park layout. Is it good? Or should I redesign the park layout?
I wouldn't mind doing that, if the majority or you say yes.

Thanks!!

[Wolfman]

Well, the last image that you submitted looks to me like you have just a smaller area fully developed. With a midway that outlines the area, separating the developed section from the untouched area. So, I suggest just modifying the midway that is dividing the finished area, and the undeveloped area. Leaving the footpaths inside the developed area to either remain the same, OR to be altered at some later date.

If anything, this would be a way cool way to depict how the park has developed between the original area and the new additions since then. (You can see this sort of thing happening in REAL parks all the time.) So it WOULD actually be quite realistic, from a evolving park design point of view.

[adamcolvin]

^Thanks, I'll take it into consideration

Well, some dipstick engineer ruined the track layout and screwed everything up. So we fired him and got the best in the business! Springbank Park took extra time just to fix the mistakes. Here's what we have so far:


Later on, Springbank Park worked their butts off to get the first test run. And we're kind enough to show you it....but it'll have to be a teaser. The rest, you may view in the next update.


Enjoy!

[coastercrazy]

As great as it always is. Really nice job on that coaster, can't wait to see the rest of it. Oh and that 2nd screen has great interaction...

Keep it up!

/CC